AI credits are the single unit of measure across all monday AI capabilities, giving your team one simple, consistent way to use and manage AI across the platform. Every AI action deducts credits from your account's quota, and the amount deducted depends on the type of task performed and, in some features, the AI model you choose to run it.
This article explains how different AI models affect credit consumption, and how to optimize your usage to get the most out of your credit allocation.
How AI credits work
AI credits apply across all monday AI features under a single unified consumption model. Every AI action deducts credits from your account quota. The amount deducted depends on two factors:
- The complexity and depth of the task performed
- The AI model chosen to perform it, where model selection is available
Credit use by feature
| Feature | Model select? | Credit use |
|---|---|---|
| monday vibe (Chat mode/Build mode) | Yes | Starting July 27, 2026: Credit consumption for monday vibe will apply across three levels. Publishing: publishing a live app will require a paid app bucket. Building: for each message (prompt) you send, credits will be consumed based on complexity. Running: if a published app uses AI capabilities, it will consume credits each time it runs, based on the model selected. |
| monday agents | No | Varies by task complexity |
| monday sidekick | No | Starting July 27, 2026: Credit consumption will be based on the complexity of each interaction, from the first message. |
| AI Notetaker | No | Per meeting minute of usage |
| AI workflows | No | Starting July 27, 2026: Credit consumption will be based on the complexity of each run. Standard plan accounts can have up to 3 active workflows, Pro up to 20, and Enterprise up to 250. Each AI-powered run consumes credits based on its complexity. |
| AI blocks | No | 8 credits per action. |
Why different AI models cost different credits
Each AI model has a unique position on the spectrum between speed and intelligence. A more capable model does more reasoning, executes more steps, and produces higher-quality output, all of which requires more credits. Choosing the right model for the task is one of the most effective ways to manage your consumption.
Available models and credit consumption in monday vibe
Both Chat (Discuss) and Build modes consume credits. Chat mode consumes fewer credits than Build mode because the model does not write or execute code. Credits are charged per message in both modes.
| Model |
Approx. credits per message |
Profile | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini Flash | ~10–20 | Fast, lightweight | Simple tweaks, colour changes, minor text edits |
| Claude Sonnet (default) | ~30–50 | Balanced, provides solid output | Most builds and everyday edits |
| Claude Opus | ~50–500 | Highly agentic, multi-step reasoning | Complex multi-page apps, deep troubleshooting |
| Auto-Select | Varies | monday automatically selects a model based on the nature of the request; make sure your request includes clear task details to support efficient model selection | When you prefer not to manage model selection manually |
Vibe app examples and credit estimates
The credit consumption for building a vibe app depends on its complexity, from a quick single-view dashboard to a full high-complexity app. Here's an estimation of credit consumption for different use cases, based on real usage data from thousands of published apps.
Simple apps
Example: "OKR Progress Tracker"
A team lead built a dashboard to track quarterly goals and progress at a glance. Two prompts created progress bars and status indicators pulled from an existing board. Published and shared in minutes.
- Prompts used: 2–5
- Credits consumed: ~140
- Model used: Claude Sonnet
- Best for: Single-view dashboards, board summaries, status overviews, simple trackers
- Models used: Sonnet + Gemini Flash
Moderate apps
Example: "Leave Tracker"
An HR manager built an app to show remaining PTO, display upcoming team absences on a calendar, and flag scheduling conflicts. The core structure was ready quickly, then refined with department filters, manager views, and color-coded warnings over a dozen iterations.
- Prompts used: 6–15
- Credits consumed: ~220
- Model used: Claude Sonnet
- Best for: Multi-view apps with filters, role-based access, custom formatting, or data from multiple boards
- Models used: Sonnet + Gemini Flash
Advanced apps
Example: "Interview Feedback Portal"
A talent acquisition team built a structured hiring workflow where interviewers submit scored feedback, recruiters see consolidated candidate summaries, and hiring managers get hire/no-hire recommendations with supporting data. Building the forms, scoring logic, and role-specific views took ~36 prompts.
- Prompts used: 16–36
- Credits consumed: ~171
- Model used: Claude Sonnet
- Best for: Multi-feature apps with business logic, multiple user roles, calculated fields, and polished UX
- Models used: Sonnet + Gemini Flash
High complexity apps
Example: "Venue Directory"
A mid-market events company built a comprehensive venue management system with a searchable directory, capacity details, availability calendars, pricing tiers, vendor contacts, and campaign tracking across dozens of locations. Over ~95 prompts, they built filtered search, comparison views, booking status indicators, and reporting dashboards for daily team use.
- Prompts used: 37+ (typically 55–160)
- Credits consumed: ~3,000
- Models used: Claude Sonnet
- Best for: Full operational systems, multi-department workflows, apps replacing standalone SaaS products or custom development
- Models used: Sonnet + Gemini Flash
How to optimize credit usage in monday vibe
Choose the right model for the task
Selecting the right model before you start a task is the fastest way to reduce unnecessary credit spend in monday vibe.
- Simple edits such as changing a colour or tweaking text: use Gemini Flash (~10–20 credits)
- Most builds and everyday edits: use Claude Sonnet (~30–50 credits, also the default in Auto-Select)
- Building a complex multi-page app: use Claude Opus for that task, then switch back to Sonnet
- Prefer not to manage model selection: leave it on Auto-Select
Use Chat mode strategically
Chat mode costs fewer credits per message than Draft mode, since no code is written. Use it to plan, get debugging guidance, or consult before switching to Draft to implement changes.
- Switch to Chat mode to plan or troubleshoot before making changes
- Use Sonnet or Flash in Chat mode
- Switch back to Draft mode only when you are ready to build
Write precise prompts
Vague prompts force the model to guess, leading to reruns. Specific prompts are more likely to produce the right result the first time.
- Weak: "The text is not right"
- Strong: "On the Projects tab, in the timeline card, change the header font from 16px to 14px"
Use UI terms when describing what to change, such as Z-axis for layering, out-of-bounds, tab name, and element name. Specify the source and target clearly, for example "Update status from Stuck to Done" rather than "Fix the status." Include screenshots when describing visual bugs, especially when using Opus.
Credit consumption in monday agents
Credit consumption depends on the complexity and depth of each task your agent performs. The estimates below are directional; exact costs vary based on the specific run, the model selected, and the instructions and skills provided to the agent.
| Task type |
Est. credits per task |
Examples | Common use cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple | ~10–50 | Quick actions, status updates | Task monitoring (PMO), reputation scans (Marketing), document review (Legal), backlog grooming (Product), candidate sourcing (HR) |
| Intermediate | ~50–150 | Multi-step workflows, summaries | Assignment workflows (PMO), campaign data integration (Marketing), document generation pipeline (Legal), resume screening (HR) |
| Complex | ~150–250 | Research, screening, reports | Multi-loop orchestration across boards, items, and external sources. Complex project pipelines (PMO), market research (Marketing), large campaign syncs (Marketing) |
| Extra complex | ~250+ | Multi-system orchestration | Long-running tasks, batch processing, deep web research, full board operations. Batch data processing, source candidates from web search (HR), rewrite articles with SEO optimization (Marketing), monitor competitor activity through web search (Marketing), summarize weekly intelligence briefing |
How to optimize credit usage in monday agents
- Give granular instructions rather than letting the agent decide. For example, under Tools, specify the exact Slack channel and define the exact action. Leaving decisions to the agent increases credit consumption.
- Avoid triggering web searches unless they are necessary for the task.
- Review the Activity tab after runs to understand what was executed and how credits were used, then refine your instructions accordingly.
- Use the Usage Limits tab in the admin section under AI Governance to allocate credits per use case and per user.
Agent examples in action
The Recruitment Screener
Processes 50 candidate CVs per day, scoring each applicant against job criteria, building a shortlist, updating status to 'Reviewed' on your board, and notifying the recruiter.
- Credits consumed: ~12,500 per month
- Model used: Claude Sonnet
- Best for: High-volume candidate screening with structured evaluation criteria
The Customer Request Router
Monitors your incoming support board, reviews every new request, assigns it to the correct team based on issue type, and creates an internal update for the team.
- Credits consumed: ~5,400 per month (based on 15 runs per day)
- Model used: Claude Sonnet
- Best for: Automated triage and routing of incoming requests
The Deep Research & Synthesis Agent
Performs deep, multi-source research on 10 complex topics per week, synthesizes findings into a structured monday doc, and updates your project board with key takeaways.
- Credits consumed: ~5,160 per month
- Model used: Claude Sonnet or Claude Opus
- Best for: In-depth research requiring web searches and synthesis
The Sprint Reviewer
Every Friday, reads your entire development board, analyzes which tasks were completed versus carried over, writes a structured retrospective update for the team, and notifies stakeholders.
- Credits consumed: ~63 per run
- Model used: Claude Sonnet
- Best for: Weekly sprint retrospectives and team reporting
Credit consumption in monday sidekick
Sidekick works interactively. Each message you send consumes credits, and a single conversation can include a mix of simple and complex tasks. Consumption depends on the depth of the request, how much board context is read, and which tools are used, such as search, updates, charts, or asset generation.
| Task type |
Est. credits per message |
Examples | Common use cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple | ~10–30 | Quick questions, light summaries, single lookups, or a single small board change | Board status check, quick pipeline or overdue count, summarize a single item or doc section, filter or list items on a board, change a single view or timeline, fix one column type |
| Intermediate | ~30–80 | Multi-step reasoning, moderate board context, charts, board creation, or several updates in one turn | Build a chart, create a new project or a board from a brief, draft a monday doc from board notes, triage a support ticket, replace or remap a column, build a dashboard |
| Complex | ~80–150 | Large board context, multiple tool calls, or orchestration across items, groups, columns, and boards | Cross-board workload or pipeline analysis, restructure a board, full dashboard or multi-view report, create a new form matching an existing board structure, compare multiple charts or views |
| Extra complex | 150+ | Long-running turns, batch processing, deep context, many sequential mutations, or full board rebuilds | Batch update hundreds of items, full board migration or rebuild, multi-column board build, align column structures across boards, deep research plus synthesis into a doc plus board updates |
Sidekick examples in action
Here's how these estimates translate into real-world use, based on task complexity multiplied by how often the task runs for example, a daily task multiplied by the number of days in a month.
Daily board status checks
Scans your sprint board each morning, lists what's overdue, and summarizes what changed.
- Credits potential spend: ~770 per month (22 workdays)
- Best for: Recurring daily status checks on a single board
Ticket triage and routing
Reads incoming tickets upon request, briefs agents on context, and suggests next steps.
- Credits potential spend: ~19,800 per month (15 tickets per day)
- Best for: High-volume ticket triage and context gathering
Building charts and reports
Builds charts and views from your live board data.
- Credits potential spend: ~660 per month (10 reports)
- Best for: Recurring visual reporting from board data
Bulk board updates
Processes large batch updates, such as reassigning owners, normalizing statuses, or importing structured data.
- Credits potential spend: ~1,256 per month (4 batch jobs); heavy one-off rebuilds can run significantly higher
- Best for: Large-scale batch operations and board rebuilds
Governance and monitoring
Admins can use the AI governance tools inside the administration section to track and monitor AI credit usage across the account. This includes credit usage per feature and per user, role-based permissions, and agent activity monitoring.
On the Enterprise plan, admins can also use the AI permissions tab to manage more detailed access to AI features, including which account roles can use them.
FAQs
If you have any questions, please reach out to our team right here. We’re available 24/7 and happy to help.